Funny Picture: Hooters Girls vs Feminists

Posted by adminebcak on Monday, June 23rd 2008   

Email to friend

23
Jun

This post will be as popular with feminists as will this site, the how to  get a girlfriend site, but I just couldn’t help myself, someone had to bring it to you and why not me.

The following picture is a perfect example on the study of opposites. On the left we’ve got the vibrant and happy Hooter’s girls, carefree and healthy. To the right we have the unkempt and morose looking feminist who looks two steps from the grave. The feminist wants the Hooters girls to be more like her, and the Hooters girls don’t. What do you think?

Related Content

Subscribe

Filed under: Funny Pictures     Tags: , , , , , , , ,
11 Comments   

11 Comments Already

commenter
SweetnPantyhose Said,
July 16th, 2008 @8:27 pm  

It is always the fat and/or ugly ones that complain.

commenter
rick Said,
December 14th, 2008 @6:17 am  

its funny how insecure people (both men and women) will always complain about good looking people. yet confident people dont complain, because they know that complaining is a vicious repetitive cycle that gets insecure people nowhere in life.

commenter
rick Said,
December 14th, 2008 @6:21 am  

its funny that way back in elementary school i was taught that we are supposed to not base people on their outward looks, but their inner beauty.

yet as a 31 year old good looking man, i look back and noticed that i got picked on in elementary school and high school once in a while by ugly looking girls and ugly guys. also when i was in the air force, i noticed that my unattractive male supervisor was very insecure, and the good looking male officers in my unit were very nice to us young soldiers.

commenter
Tech Stuff Geek Said,
December 14th, 2008 @2:34 pm  

Hey Rick,

I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. It appears to be rooted in childhood, where rejection is now manifesting itself in a perverted sense of justice. Ironically, the feminist believes that removing a woman’s choice of occupation is empowering. But in fact, insulting and preventing women from doing what they love is misogynistic, which i firmly believe is a cleverly disguised form of misandry, the hatred of men, which in the end is just good old fashion misanthropy, the hatred of humanity.

But we all know that hatred of humanity is just hatred of oneself.

commenter
ericarox Said,
December 15th, 2008 @5:05 pm  

It has nothing to do with looks. It has to do with women turining themselves into products rather than human beings. What long term effects does this have on women? Oh yes, and i’m very confident in my looks and education. I happen to know of plenty of feminsts that are very attractive, For example Selma Hayek.

commenter
Tech Stuff Geek Said,
December 15th, 2008 @8:15 pm  

ericarox thanks for your comments,

Question, do you think that Selma Hayek would hold a sign to protest and denigrate those women’s choice to work at Hooters?

When you consider Selma Hayek’s often provocative films and photos, it’s surprising that feminists haven’t tried rescinding her membership. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the lady above protesting Selma one day.

commenter
Sandra Said,
June 9th, 2009 @8:10 pm  

Feminism is a sickness that is based on Misanrist hate. Dumb, insecure, logically stunted and incompetent girls are the ones supporting feminism. Feminism is a sexist CULT that is based on hate. Girls who feel good about themselves stay far away from the sexist misandrist feminist sickness. Notice that dumb feminists always regurgitate the sick feminist hate slogans like gospel. Those feminists are brain dead.

commenter
ebcak admin Said,
June 10th, 2009 @7:35 pm  

great points Sandra, this will always be a sensitive subject, but its great that people have the courage to speak up.

Anonymous Said,
July 12th, 2009 @1:02 pm  

stupid bitch

commenter
Sarah Said,
December 19th, 2009 @9:35 pm  

Because they’re smiling, the Hooters girls MUST be “happy and carefree”, right? Why can’t they just be doing their job? In this picture I see women are who products of their environments and circumstances. The women are left are doing a job to make money; waitressing is not usually a career route. The woman on the right is just making a statement, perhaps because she feels a moral obligation to raise awareness of gender disparities. Couldn’t they all be feminists?

commenter
adminebcak Said,
December 19th, 2009 @10:44 pm  

Sarah, perhaps that is a question better posed to the feminists. And yes, smiling is often a sign of happiness, and carefree was an embellishment on my part, only because it fit well with the negative ambiance created by the sign holding feminist. The feminists very presence is an indication of the intonation of a moral superiority by suggesting that a woman’s vocation is only appropriate when it is backed by a feminist stamp of approval. This is a clear indication that the issue at hand is not about moral unjust, but about social control.

BTW, your comment about waitressing not being a career move, well that is just plain snobbery, and an insult to all people who wait tables. While you are busy contemplating what is an appropriate career move for women the world over, consider the millions of men and women who are feeding their children by working these jobs, perhaps they too would feel a ‘moral obligation’ to tell you where to go.

Related Post

Please Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments will be moderated



«
»